The initial architectural plan was made by Albert Mayer, an associate of Mathew Novicki. Unfortunately due to his death in a road accident, the great architect had to be replaced by the legendary Swiss architect Le Corbusier who along with his team of Maxwell Fry, Jane B Drew, Pierre Jeanneret and the young promising Indian team of M.N. Sharma, U.E. Chowdhary and Aditya Prakash laid the plan for the new capital of Punjab in 1951.
With a human development index of .86 and a population of around 100,000 and the highest per capita income in India , Chandigarh the capital of Punjab and Haryana, is one of the most well laid out cities in the country. The city that was initially designed to home some 500,000 habitants has today over double the population and is one of the highly densely populated city with 7900 habitants per square kilometers. Yet, the signs of infrastructural fabric withering away is far from visible!
With the symbol of an open hand, the city of Le Corbusier , continues to welcome government offices, people & corporations alike with her open arms. The capital of Punjab & Haryana and itself a Union Territory , it holds some15 medium to large Industrial units, has over 2500 small scale industries. The Chandigarh IT Park hosts the best names in the IT sector and continues to retain top spot as the ‘Emerging Outsourcing & IT Services Destinations worldwide.’
So what is it in its architecture that despite her burgeoning population, increasing office and bureaucratic presence, Chandigarh continues to remain clean, green and spacious. Perhaps the reason resonates in the policy making and planning that was subsequently followed by development.
Ambitiously dreamt by India ’s first PM, Pandit Nehru and painstakingly envisioned by Le Corbusier, the city is divided in sixty sectors of 800 by 1200 each covering a total area of 114 km square. The highly sophisticated 7 lane system of circulation in the city, successfully mitigates the menace of traffic and preserves the habitant zones from the nuisance of traffic. Interestingly, city has no sector numbered 13. Seems like even the scientific designers had a touch of superstition! Each sector is well equipped with public amenities, cultural centres and green spaces and there are habitation zones for the rich and for the middle class bourgeoise alike. Interestingly the central sector number 17 situated at the heart of the city iis the principal centres of commerce, restaurant and bars. The infrastructural burden on sector 17 is supported by ancillary commercial centres in sector 35. Also all the other sectors have their fair share of everyday malls, magazines, daily necessities and schools.
Compare this with the 'planned' unplanned development in India ’s unarguably very important cities: Delhi & Mumbai. Delhi with a population of around twenty million habitants, 1500 km square and a population density of around 12,000 per kilometer square is an infrastructural nightmare. Mumbai, the commercial capital and significant contributor to GDP and an average per capita income of over $ 1000, is an even more gory story. Millions of homeless sleeping on the streets, living painful lives at the mercy of police, gangs and mafia, it indeed is a deplorable and grim picture of an emerging economy. Is unplanned development, unmitigated migration and policy failure the genus of these modern day soulless jungles of concrete?
Does this development and infrastructural layout in the City Beautiful have any lessons for the Commercial and Political capital of India ?